Fix conditional wrappers for vararg runtime calls#3290
Fix conditional wrappers for vararg runtime calls#3290ChrisRackauckas-Claude wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #3290 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 74.28% 74.29%
=======================================
Files 66 66
Lines 22602 22609 +7
=======================================
+ Hits 16791 16797 +6
- Misses 5811 5812 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Co-Authored-By: Chris Rackauckas <accounts@chrisrackauckas.com>
3aa1eb9 to
723fada
Compare
|
Rebased onto current main (base now includes #3293, #3294, #3295 and v0.13.177 bump) and force-pushed with lease. Post-rebase local verification: I also checked two focused suites corresponding to earlier CI failure summaries before the rebase: Earlier CI failures I inspected were not in the new setproperty regression. The integration failures included self-hosted runner/container errors, a timeout, and a Molly segfault; the main CI failures I checked locally passed in focused form. |
This PR should be ignored until reviewed by @ChrisRackauckas.
Summary
Local verification
Also checked two CI-adjacent focused suites locally on Julia 1.10 after CI failures appeared:
Notes
The original SciML issue workload gets past the previous BoundsError with this patch, but still later fails with a separate IllegalTypeAnalysisException in SciMLSensitivity.ReverseLossCallback.